It has been recently suggested that my books are “full of
sex.” When pressed for an example, the only one offered was the opening story
in Flawed by Design, where the prostitute, about to pour her
tears upon her Savior’s feet in anguish over her occupation, wrestles in a
field before dawn with God—with what He made her. She shakes her breasts in
front of Him, daring Him to kill her. Falling to the earth with bitter weeping,
she expects a lightning bolt. Instead, she feels His tender compassion.
Many people have written to tell me how this passage moved
them to tears—in fact, all the writers have been women. (After ten years, I am
still moved to tears whenever re-reading this story.) In my opinion—and in the
opinion of many others—this story perfectly introduces a book about
being flawed by design.
But what kills it, in the mind of some, is the word
“breasts.” Worse, I briefly describe the prostitute’s breasts as being perfect.
“I can’t hand out this book to people,” says a friend, “for fear they would
stumble at it.”
Oops. |
I wonder if this friend, who finds the brief allusions to
sex in some of my books so objectionable, has trouble handing out the Bible. He
should. If the standard for an “unsharable book” is the mention of sex, the
Bible wins hands down. The Bible is full of prostitutes, concubines, penises, breasts,
polygamy, seed-spilling, and menstrual cycles. The entire book of Song of
Solomon fits the modern-day standards for erotica. In Esther 2:5-7, it is God
Himself Who points out, concerning Esther: “The maiden had a lovely shape and was good-looking in appearance.”
By my count, God
brings up sex about 1,000 more times than I do. I have a long way to go to
catch up with Him. I probably never will; He created sex, and I did not. No
wonder He’s so unapologetic about it.
HUMANITY ON DISPLAY, I.E., “HONESTY ”
What makes my work
so different and effective is that I am myself. In the midst of giving you
spiritual truth, I tell you about my life. I am not ashamed to be human in every category of life, not just the sexual category. This honesty helps
people like my books. I don’t have to work at it, because being myself is the
most natural thing in the world to me.
The only thing worse than an M&M is a sexy female one. |
If you were to
listen to the old ZenderTalks and read my early books, you would notice two
common themes: M&Ms and black coffee. Back in the day, I was passionate
about these things and often shared with readers and listeners how these two
products helped me through life. It is interesting that no one has ever accused
me of being “coffee obsessed,” or “M&M obsessed.” It is only when I mention
the word “breast,” or bring up some aspect of feminine beauty, that some people
become offended. The conclusion is unavoidable: Those who object to the sexual
references but not to these other things believe M&Ms to be good, but sex to
be evil. Coffee is pure, but sex is tainted.
This is Gnosticism.
(Google it, folks; it ain't pretty.)
As Kingsley G. Bond writes in the
foreword to Clyde Pilkington’s book, Due Benevolence:
It is not surprising that the mistakes of our [religious] past
should have given us
a poor view of something that God made and pronounced "good." It is almost
impossible, now, to divest ourselves of the view that sex is an
obscenity. However strenuously we try to disturb our prejudice against it, the
view is deeply ingrained that sex is a power which exercises a hold over life
that is at least dangerous and more likely evil. Containment is the common
approach, instead of liberation.
Sex is not a monstrous mistake of the Creator, but something
for which we may
expect that God holds a constructive purpose in view. No doubt
that purpose is
being served in spite of our upset situation, but how much
better if the good for
which this faculty was intended could be pinpointed and its
drive directed into
ways that would benefit all.
Sex is in just about everything. This is not bad, but the
natural way of things.
Therefore the Christian has to start where the Bible starts, by
acknowledging
things as God has given them to us. After all, the whole of
life is either male or
female, and of all the instinctive drives that have been given
to us, hunger is the
most compelling, but sex is the most pervasive. It naturally
touches everything …
Indeed life would be cold, hard, and metallic without it. God did
not give us a
sexless world. It is not for us to fight against God’s order of
creation, but rather to
seek to know more and find the line of purpose to follow.
Kingsley G. Bond,
Tidings (1967)
Clyde Pilkington writes in the same book:
We have a Bible filled with sex. There was clearly a different
mindset in Biblical times. There is a different mindset by God. What seems so
unusual to us was commonplace within their setting. Our religious society has
mastered the art of calling “evil good, and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20 ). In one sweeping motion, they have taken
God’s wonderful gift of sexuality and almost uniformly called it evil.
SEXUAL
OBSESSION
This poor guy is sex-obsessed |
What is sexual
obsession? Remember how I pointed out to you in my book, How to Be Free From Sin While Smoking a
Cigarette, that a slave of sin is
just as much someone who sins like crazy as someone who tries like crazy not to
sin? Slavery to sin requires a fixation on sin—whether to resist or indulge it.
The same paradox applies to sex. I make a brief mention of sex in a book or a
talk, and the religious reader (the reader for whom sex—in spite of his or her protestations
to the contrary—is inherently evil), fixates upon that passage and can’t let it
go. I have long since moved on to another topic, but the sex obsessed can’t move on. Why? They are obsessed with sex. I have moved on, but they haven't.
Who is obsessed
with sex?
To speak openly
about sex is natural. To celebrate feminine beauty (God Himself sets the pace
here; read Ruth and The Song of Solomon), is
natural. God pronounced the male and the female “good.” To make it evil is yet
another ugly by-product of religion that infects even the saints.
Wake up, people |
When it comes to human
sexuality, I often feel like the most normal, well-adjusted person in the room.
I wish this liberation upon all who read. Those who will dare to begin
considering sex as God considers it (He considers it “good”) will—paradoxically—find
themselves at last delivered from the sexual obsession that has so oddly turned
them against the natural marvel of the female breast.
© 2012 by Martin Zender
(To order Due Benevolence, Clyde Pilkington’s “revelation-a-page” treatise about Biblical
sexuality, click here: /http://duebenevolence.com/.
It is the best 25 bucks you will ever spend.)
3 comments:
Hi Martin,
I always laugh when people get upset with "sex".
When a caucasian woman shows her breasts in a movie or a tv film, they shout "Shame!!!!!!" But when a couple of black or indian women in the jungle are filmed on location, walking around half naked, a sigh is heard: How endearing!
The same goes for paintings. The people who shout "Shame", stand in admiration in front of a nude by Rembrandt or another master. O, sorry, that is art of course.
Yes, there is a double mentality.
Did you know that in Victorian England some people even had some sort of dresses around the legs of tables, so they would not be reminded of nude legs of a woman?
Wim
As a woman, I don't consider any of Martin's books capable of increasing sexual arousal. Chief among things that arouse me is the Mercedes-Benz 380SL convertible.
Sex is the most awful, filthy thing on earth, and you should save it for someone you love.
This man who complained is most certainly American. As Marlene Dietrich once said: "In America sex is an obsession, in other parts of the world it is a fact."
Oh, Martin. I wish your books were full of sex; rest assured they'd never get dusty.
Hi Martin,
Just want to tell you how much I loved to translate that first chapter of "Flawed", every breast, sorry, word of it!
By the way, I've now reached page 193 of "The Idiot", I hope to finish it in a few months.
You and Rebecca are in my prayers.
Love, Anke
Post a Comment